Suchergebnisse

Abstract: The conditions of employment of a professional public service together with the wide‐ranging consequences of the actions of public servants combine to require considerable moral responsibility. Whatever political neutrality means for public servants, it does not mean moral neutrality. If public servants were never to exercise moral judgement in moments of truth there would be little justification for endowing the profession with the status and security it now enjoys. After some discussion of the origins of the professional public service, several recent cases of morally responsible public servants are reviewed and the arguments frequently given to avoid or trivialise morality are evaluated. My claim is that courage is the key to morality. The ordinary moral obligations that lie upon us all apply with added force to public servants. The truth that the eye of doubt beholds is that political neutrality brings moral responsibility.… the more civil servants, the more thieves…The Great Elector… not from the Castle … not from the village…Kafka… polite, upright, and mild…Hegel

In Hegel's political theory many important and difficult functions were assigned to government. Because of its recruitment on merit and complex structures it is the bureaucracy outlined in Hegel's theory that must assume the functions of government. Hegel's account of bureaucracy corresponds to seven of Weber's ten criteria. Where they differ is in Hegel's insistence that the bureaucracy has a moral mission that defines its functional one. Commitment to that moral mission, according to Hegel, can be attained only through the continual development of ethical character as recommended by Aristotle and Kant. To meet Hegel's standard of bureaucracy, a government must be organized in a certain way to be functionally effective and efficient, but it must also be profoundly committed to the common good.